I have tried to rationalize how the Angels could let team GM Tony Reagins trade for Vernon Wells. The Angels surrendered catcher-first baseman Mike Napoli, who is a productive but streaky home run hitter. The Angels also included reserve outfielder Juan Rivera in the trade. On talent alone, we broke even. Though Wells will hit and play a good left field, how many power-hitting catchers like Napoli are there in baseball?
What makes this trade a fireable offense is twofold. First, the Angels will assume virtually all of the $86 million owed to Wells the next four years. Second, if the Angels are to pay this huge contract for a not-so-young not-so-star player, why did they not receive a couple of prospects or a second big leaguer in the deal?
This is what happens when your team, more specifically your team's general manager, has no plan going into the off-season. The Angels' needs were simple to define. Need leadoff batter. Need third baseman. Improve team defense. Improve team speed. Get younger. Improve bullpen.
At least the Angels improved their bullpen.
So. Who bats leadoff? Who is the team's third baseman? How exactly will the defense be improved?
Reagins wasted too many opportunities this off-season. Did not go after Jayson Werth. Treated Carl Crawford as if we were his only option. Lowballed Adrian Beltre. Did not make an offer to Cliff Lee. Signing a star player (even a star we did not need) would have allowed us to trade from strength. We could have acquired a leadoff batter or a third baseman via trade. If we had any depth.
Well. We had depth. At catcher. Until we traded that depth for the $22 million man.
-B. C. Helm